<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Investors Like New Battery Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carbonanotubebattery.com/investors-like-new-battery-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carbonanotubebattery.com/investors-like-new-battery-technology/</link>
	<description>The future is now</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 12:14:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://carbonanotubebattery.com/investors-like-new-battery-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carbonanotubebattery.com/?p=307#comment-91</guid>
		<description>While NiMH may be great for commuter vehicles and other PHEV applications - It would seem that people who want V8 Turbo &amp; Nitrous type performance in an EV will be using this form of Lithium Chemistry, when you consider its ability to deliver 30 X the rated power steadily and 10 second pulses at 50 X its rated power! 

It is true that the Tesla does not use it but still gets sub 4 second zero to 60 times with Li-Ion (Cobalt), it has a fairly large battery pack at 900 lbs, and this chemistry would weigh in at 1200 lbs or more for the same energy - but such pack could blow all the power circuits out before hardly warming up the batteries! (That&#039;s why the Killacycle uses them - Power!)

The challenge is Power vs Energy: Li-Ion (Cobalt) 18650 Cells come in at over 2000 mAh per cell while the A123&#039;s have only only 1100 mAh - but - typical specs for the Cobalt cells are maximum 2X the energy for power output (2C) while the A123&#039;s can dump power at 30C!

I would like to see a group build an Open-Source Project combining the two cell types  -  in a Hybrid Module or Battery! The Cobalt cells could be used to provide up to a max of 2C while the A123 Cells could deliver the the High C loads for accelleration - like a Lithium + Supercapacitor layout!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While NiMH may be great for commuter vehicles and other PHEV applications &#8211; It would seem that people who want V8 Turbo &amp; Nitrous type performance in an EV will be using this form of Lithium Chemistry, when you consider its ability to deliver 30 X the rated power steadily and 10 second pulses at 50 X its rated power! </p>
<p>It is true that the Tesla does not use it but still gets sub 4 second zero to 60 times with Li-Ion (Cobalt), it has a fairly large battery pack at 900 lbs, and this chemistry would weigh in at 1200 lbs or more for the same energy &#8211; but such pack could blow all the power circuits out before hardly warming up the batteries! (That&#8217;s why the Killacycle uses them &#8211; Power!)</p>
<p>The challenge is Power vs Energy: Li-Ion (Cobalt) 18650 Cells come in at over 2000 mAh per cell while the A123&#8217;s have only only 1100 mAh &#8211; but &#8211; typical specs for the Cobalt cells are maximum 2X the energy for power output (2C) while the A123&#8217;s can dump power at 30C!</p>
<p>I would like to see a group build an Open-Source Project combining the two cell types  &#8211;  in a Hybrid Module or Battery! The Cobalt cells could be used to provide up to a max of 2C while the A123 Cells could deliver the the High C loads for accelleration &#8211; like a Lithium + Supercapacitor layout!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

